CHANNEL PARTNERS
Your brand on every page.Our engine underneath.
You already hold the client relationship. What you do not hold is the contracted rate data that tells a client whether the rate they signed is above or below the local peer median. That is the part we built, and it can ship under your name.
The gap in your offer. You can tell a client what was paid. You cannot tell them what they agreed to.
Every billing company can read a remittance. Almost none can answer the question a practice owner actually asks, which is whether the contract itself is competitive. That answer does not live in the claim history. It lives in the rates insurers are required to publish.
What you can already show
What was paid, after adjudication, per claim. A record of outcomes, and a good one.
What clients keep asking for
Whether the rate they signed is competitive for their specialty in their own market, per payer and per code.
Why it is hard to build
The published files are enormous, inconsistent between payers, and re-issued on their own schedule. Reading them once is a project. Keeping them current is a product.
What ships under your name. A rate answer per NPI, per payer, per code.
A per-NPI score
A 300 to 850 score for a provider against the local peer median and against their own payers, with the target set at the top of the local market.
Per-payer comparison
Where each payer sits relative to local peers on the codes that carry the provider's volume, so a renegotiation has a stated basis.
A leverage artifact
A document your team can put in front of a payer, carrying the documented reimbursement opportunity and the evidence behind it.
Your brand, not ours
Your logo, your colours, your domain, your client-facing language. Reddenda does not need to appear to your client at all.
Every figure is modeled from published rates, not guaranteed. We say documented reimbursement opportunity and we mean exactly that: what the published data supports, paired with the qualifier, never a promise of recovery.
Two ways in. Carry it yourself, or send it to us.
| White-label | Referral | |
|---|---|---|
| Who the client sees | You. Your brand end to end. | Us, introduced by you. |
| Who runs the conversation | Your team, with our output behind it. | Our team, with you kept in the loop. |
| What you need in-house | Someone who can talk contracts with a client. | Nothing beyond the introduction. |
| Best when | Rate work is becoming part of what you sell. | You want clients served without adding a line of business. |
| Commercials | Scoped on a call. | Scoped on a call. |
Partner and portfolio economics are never posted on a public page. They depend on volume, on which specialties you serve, and on the states your clients practise in, because the permitted shape of a fee is set by state law rather than by preference. That is a conversation, not a table.
The index behind it. What the corpus is indexed toward.
314M+
contracted rate records
500+
payers
50
states
9.2M+
provider NPIs
Read that as scope, not as a live query. It is the universe this platform indexes toward. What is live and queryable for a given client on the day you ask is a smaller number, it moves as payers publish, and we will tell you what it is for their NPIs rather than quoting this figure back at you.
What this is not. Stated here rather than discovered later.
Not a billing system
We do not submit, scrub or post claims, and we do not replace anything in your current stack.
Not a guarantee
A documented opportunity is what the published rates support. Whether a payer moves depends on the payer, the contract and the negotiation.
Not a national average
Every comparison is against the local peer median and the provider's own payers. A national figure would be easier to produce and useless to act on.
No PHI, by design
Nothing we need is protected health information. We work from NPIs, payers, codes and published rates.
Bring one client book. Leave knowing what a rate answer under your brand would look like.
A thirty minute working session on real NPIs and real payers from your own book. No slides, no deck, and no number quoted before anyone has seen what you carry.
Prefer to start smaller? Score a single provider first and see the shape of the output before you put your name on it.